<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>4A&#039;s Review Central &#187; confidential information</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reviewcentral.aaaalabs.com/tag/confidential-information/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reviewcentral.aaaalabs.com</link>
	<description>For RFPs and Pitches</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:49:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>RFI&#8217;s/RFP&#8217;s for Undisclosed Marketers</title>
		<link>http://reviewcentral.aaaalabs.com/requests-for-information/rfisrfps-for-undisclosed-marketers/</link>
		<comments>http://reviewcentral.aaaalabs.com/requests-for-information/rfisrfps-for-undisclosed-marketers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Review Central</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Review Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4A's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidential information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviewcentral.aaaalabs.com/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is currently a self described &#8220;Procurement Intelligence Firm&#8221; circulating an RFI for an undisclosed healthcare marketer. The consultant is asking agencies to provide information—including information that may be deemed Confidential Information (CI)—as an initial step in a process of identifying agencies to participate in an RFP for a &#8220;Fortune 500&#8243; healthcare account. The 4A&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is currently a self described &#8220;Procurement Intelligence Firm&#8221; circulating an RFI for an undisclosed healthcare marketer. The consultant is asking agencies to provide information—including  information that may be deemed Confidential Information (CI)—as an initial step in a process of identifying agencies to participate in an RFP for a &#8220;<em>Fortune</em> 500&#8243; healthcare account.</p>
<p><a href="http://www2.aaaa.org/agency/compensation/positionpapers/Pages/120600_search.aspx" target="_self">The 4A&#8217;s and the ANA Best Practice Guidance for Agency Search</a> cautions against reviews for undisclosed marketers.</p>
<p>In the past, &#8220;consultants&#8221; have conducted RFI&#8217;s and RFP&#8217;s for undisclosed advertisers as a means to obtain information for the consultant&#8217;s database.</p>
<p>Without knowing the marketer, an agency cannot evaluate the potential merits of participating in an RFI or RFP; therefore agencies should proceed with caution when they are asked to participate in a process that does not disclose the marketer.</p>
<p>Tom Finneran<br />
EVP, Agency Management Services, 4A&#8217;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reviewcentral.aaaalabs.com/requests-for-information/rfisrfps-for-undisclosed-marketers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

