<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>4A&#039;s Review Central &#187; business development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reviewcentral.aaaalabs.com/tag/business-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reviewcentral.aaaalabs.com</link>
	<description>For RFPs and Pitches</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:49:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Does the 4A&#8217;s Have a Plan to Gain Wider Adoption of Review Central by Member Agencies?</title>
		<link>http://reviewcentral.aaaalabs.com/requests-for-information/does-the-4as-gave-a-plan-to-gain-wider-adoption-of-review-central-by-member-agencies/</link>
		<comments>http://reviewcentral.aaaalabs.com/requests-for-information/does-the-4as-gave-a-plan-to-gain-wider-adoption-of-review-central-by-member-agencies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 13:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Review Central</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Review Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review central]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviewcentral.aaaalabs.com/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve looked at the Review Central reviews of reviews, and I have a concern. I don&#8217;t see any agency in a review situation being willing to post comments on that review, negative or positive. It would be burning a bridge with the client and/or the consultant that would impact negatively against the agency and BizDev [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve looked at the Review Central reviews of reviews, and I have a concern.</p>
<p>I  don&#8217;t see any agency in a review situation being willing to post comments on  that review, negative or positive. It would be burning a bridge with the client  and/or the consultant that would impact negatively against the agency and BizDev  person.</p>
<p>That said, how is this site going to acquire value if agencies aren&#8217;t willing to post? I see this as a  well-intentioned experiment, but I would be surprised if it gained traction  beyond a few posts from small-scope reviews. Does the 4A&#8217;s have a plan to gain wider adoption by member  agencies?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Josh  Davenport<br />
Bernstein-Rein</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reviewcentral.aaaalabs.com/requests-for-information/does-the-4as-gave-a-plan-to-gain-wider-adoption-of-review-central-by-member-agencies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

